Meta Platforms (META) — PoorCharlie Research Report

Price $612 Live quote

Market cap $1,605,578M ~2,538M shares

Enterprise value $1.53T Net cash $22.5B (cash $81.2B, debt $58.7B)

Overall score 78 Strong · out of 100

Score breakdown

78/100

Strong

Moat

17/20

Scale moat is undisputed — 3.56B DAPs, no Western rival. ROIC 28.9% / ROCE 31.6% above 10yr median. Compounding AI ad flywheel: Q1 2026 impressions +19% AND price/ad +12% simultaneously.

Management

14/20

Year-of-Efficiency delivery and AI ad gains are textbook. Counterweight: every CapEx guide revises upward — Susan Li says “we have continued to underestimate our compute needs.” Founder voting control with no backstop.

Business risk

13/20

FTC antitrust appeal seeking Instagram/WhatsApp divestiture is the existential tail. RL losses ~$19B/yr. Multi-front regulatory exposure (GDPR, DMA, DSA, youth-addiction tort). Single key-person concentration.

Key ratios

17/20

Revenue +33% YoY Q1 2026 with margin holding at 41%. 5yr revenue CAGR 19.6% — accelerating. The drag: FCF/share -6.4% TTM and 1yr ROIIC 0.87%, both pure CapEx artefacts.

Valuation

17/20

~33.6x P/FCF vs 10yr median 30.8x; P/owner-earnings ~60x. Reverse-DCF prices ~17% FCF/share growth for 10 years — close to historical trend. Base case fair value $545: -11%. No meaningful margin of safety on owner earnings.

0–39 Poor 40–59 Weak 60–74 Average 75–89 Strong 90–100 Exceptional

One-line thesis: Own the most powerful digital-advertising machine ever built — 3.56 billion daily users, a compounding AI-driven ad flywheel, and WhatsApp barely monetised — but accept that the price is full and FCF per share is temporarily shrinking as a $125–145B capex cycle absorbs all operating cash flow growth.

Part 1

Business Overview

1.1Business Model

Family of Apps (FoA, ~99% of revenue): Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, Threads. Targeted advertising against the attention of 3.56B daily active people. Revenue = impressions × price per impression; AI ranking systems work both levers simultaneously.
Reality Labs (RL, ~1% of revenue): Quest VR headsets, Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses, Horizon Worlds. Runs ~$19B annual operating loss. Strategic emphasis shifted from metaverse/VR-first to AI-enabled glasses as the “next computing platform.”
Advertising moat is scale-based: no other Western platform approaches 3.56B DAPs. Small-to-medium business advertisers have no comparably efficient alternative for global consumer reach.
AI ad flywheel: each quarter produces specific, measurable improvements (Lattice, GEM, Andromeda, Adaptive Ranking Model). Q1 2026 ARM: +1.6% offsite conversion, +6% landing-page-view conversion. Compounds multiplicatively over time.
Founder voting control: Mark Zuckerberg CEO since 2004, majority voting via dual-class structure (Class B = 10 votes/share). All major bets (CapEx ramp, MSL, glasses thesis) are his personal conviction. Susan Li CFO.
Revenue mix shifting: WhatsApp paid messaging and Meta Verified are the second growth curve. FoA other revenue +74% YoY in Q1 2026 ($885M).

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §1 · Annual report 2025.pdf ^{[1] [2]}

1.2Revenue Sources

Segment	Q1 2026 ($M)	YoY	% of revenue
FoA ad revenue	55,000	+33% (+29% cc)	98%
FoA other (WhatsApp + subs)	885	+74%	1.6%
Reality Labs	402	-2%	0.7%
Total revenue	56,300	+33%	100%

The two-lever signal Q1 2026 impressions +19% AND price per ad +12% — the ideal combination. Simultaneous engagement growth and pricing growth means no monetisation fatigue. Revenue +33% beat the $53.5–56.5B guide.

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §2 · META-Q1-2026-Earnings-Notes.md ^{[1] [3]}

1.3Key Performance Indicators

3.56B daily active people (March 2026); small QoQ dip from Iran internet outages and Russia WhatsApp block.
Ad impressions +19% and price per ad +12% YoY in Q1 2026 — both levers firing.
Operating margin 41% (Q1 2026); FY2025 41.2% vs 10yr median 39.7%.
FCF $12.4B (Q1 only) on operating cash flow ~$32B — CapEx eating the difference.
CapEx $19.8B in Q1 alone (~$80B annualised). FY2026 guide raised to $125–145B from prior $115–135B, 90 days after issuance.
$107B new contractual commitments locked in Q1 alone — multi-year cloud and infrastructure agreements not yet on the income statement.
WhatsApp Business AI: 1M → 10M weekly conversations in one quarter; $2B+ ARR crossed in Q4 2025.
AI glasses daily users tripled YoY by Q1 2026; Ray-Ban Meta Optics and Oakley partnerships launched.
77,900 employees end of Q1 2026 (-1% QoQ); May 2026 workforce reduction announced.

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §2 & §5 · META-Q1-2026-Earnings-Call-Transcript.pdf ^{[1] [3] [4]}

Part 2

Moat

2.1Industry Overview & Growth

Global digital advertising is the world's largest commercial market. Meta + Google control the majority of non-Chinese display/search. No third Western entrant has approached this scale.
AI as ad-stack accelerator: ranking, targeting, and creative-generation models are now the primary R&D battleground. Meta's in-house compute build (MSL, MetaCompute) is positioned as the durable advantage.
WhatsApp monetisation is structural greenfield: 2B+ users globally at near-zero ARPU. Achieving 30% of Instagram's ARPU would add $15–20B in annual revenue — not yet in consensus models.
AI glasses are a hardware-platform optionality bet. Ray-Ban Meta, Oakley, and forthcoming display-equipped versions are early evidence; not yet a revenue line.
Regulatory backdrop intensifying: EU DMA, EU DSA, GDPR, FTC consent order, youth-addiction tort, and the FTC antitrust appeal seeking Instagram/WhatsApp divestiture are the active legal stack.

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §1 & §6 ^[1]

2.2Qualitative Competitor Analysis

Alphabet / Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL)Tier 1

The only Western advertising platform of comparable scale. Search vs social are largely complementary attention pools; both benefit from AI-driven ad targeting. Co-leader of the global digital-ad duopoly.

TikTok / ByteDance (private)Tier 2

The only short-form video platform that has materially taken engagement share from Meta. Geopolitical and regulatory headwinds in the US/EU partially insulate Meta. Instagram Reels was the structural response.

Amazon Advertising (NASDAQ: AMZN)Tier 2

Fastest-growing competitor in the advertising stack, anchored by retail purchase-intent data. Different demand surface (transactional vs awareness) than Meta's; competition is for ad-budget share rather than user time.

Snap, Pinterest, X, RedditNiche

All sub-scale relative to Meta. Engagement and revenue per user are an order of magnitude below FoA. No credible challenger to the 3.56B DAP base.

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §1 & §5 ^[1]

2.3Moat Analysis

Moat type	Strength	Evidence
Network effects	Strong	3.56B DAPs; FoA mutual reinforcement (Instagram ↔ WhatsApp ↔ Facebook); no Western platform of comparable scale.
Scale / data advantage	Strong	Largest behavioural-signal corpus outside Google; AI ranking models compound on impression volume.
Intangible assets	Strong	Brand, ad-targeting IP, AI patents (Llama / MSL / Muse Spark), 26-year operating history of the apps.
Switching costs (advertisers)	Medium	SMB advertisers can leave but lose access to 3.56B DAPs — no functional substitute. Big advertisers diversify across Meta + Google + retail-media.
Switching costs (users)	Medium	Social-graph lock-in (Facebook), creator-graph lock-in (Instagram), conversation history (WhatsApp).
Cost advantage	Medium	Operating margin 41% during heavy investment phase. Marginal cost of ad delivery near zero.
Regulatory	Negative	Active FTC antitrust appeal seeking Instagram/WhatsApp divestiture; EU DMA/DSA; GDPR exposure. Regulatory works against, not for, the moat.

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §5 & §6 ^[1]

2.4Additional Moat Considerations

Selected from the 26-item framework. Items shown are the strongest supporting points and the most material concerns for Meta specifically.

YesNetwork effects at scale3.56B DAPs; FoA cross-graph reinforcement

YesPricing powerQ1 2026 price/ad +12% YoY alongside +19% impressions

YesCapital-light incremental costMarginal ad delivery near zero; operating margin 41%

YesHigh ROIC / ROCE28.9% / 31.6%, above 10yr median

YesBuyback discipline / share count shrinking~1.1% net buyback/yr 3yr, ~2.4% 5yr despite $22.3B SBC

YesFounder-led with alignmentZuckerberg majority voting; long-term horizon

ModPredictability of revenueSubject to ad-cycle and macro; AI gains insulate but do not eliminate

ModCapital allocation outside coreRL ~$19B/yr loss; glasses early signal but no revenue yet

ModReturns on incremental capital1yr ROIIC 0.87% during CapEx ramp; 3yr historical 25.2%

NoRegulatory threatsFTC antitrust appeal seeks Instagram/WhatsApp divestiture; active

NoKey-person concentrationDual-class voting; no disclosed succession; 2022 metaverse pivot precedent

NoCapEx predictabilityEvery CapEx guide has revised upward; structural pattern acknowledged

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §5 & §6 · Meta analysis from poorcharlie.io.txt (framework) ^{[1] [9]}

Part 3

Management

3.1Leadership & Tenure

Mark Zuckerberg — Founder & CEO since 2004. Majority voting control via Class B shares (10 votes/share). All major strategic bets (AI CapEx, glasses, MSL) are his personal conviction.
Susan Li — CFO. Confirmed on Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 calls. Disciplined disclosure style; explicit acknowledgement on Q1 2026 call: “We have continued to underestimate our compute needs.”
Dina Powell McCormick — President / Vice Chairman. Hired 2026 to lead government and sovereign partnerships for compute capacity (MetaCompute initiative).
Dual-class capital structure: 2,187,177,748 Class A shares (1 vote) and 342,377,716 Class B shares (10 votes) outstanding as of Jan 23, 2026. Class B controls ~61% of voting power on ~13.5% of economics; Zuckerberg holds the majority of the Class B block and therefore a majority of total voting power.
Item 12 ownership table: incorporated by reference from the 2026 Proxy Statement (to be filed within 120 days of fiscal year end). Specific NEO share counts and "directors and executive officers as a group" totals therefore not in the 10-K itself.
Recent insider sales (Rule 10b5-1 plans adopted Q4 2025): CFO Susan Li — up to 112,273 Class A shares plus 2026 net-settled grants, plan terminates Nov 24, 2026; COO Javier Olivan — up to 43,333 Class A shares plus 2026 net-settled grants, plan terminates Feb 20, 2027; director Peggy Alford — up to $1M Class A.
Equity comp scale: $22.3B SBC TTM ≈ 46% of reported FCF; mitigated by net buybacks shrinking share count ~1.1%/yr (3yr) and ~2.4%/yr (5yr). RSU/PSU mix and vesting terms disclosed in the proxy (not yet filed).
Three-act management narrative since 2023: (1) Year of Efficiency — ~21,000 layoffs, margin reset 25% → 41%; (2) AI Infrastructure Ramp 2024–25; (3) Personal Superintelligence / AI Acceleration 2026 with MSL launch and Muse Spark.
Key-person concentration: dual-class structure leaves no institutional check. 10-K risk factor explicitly notes Zuckerberg participates in “combat sports, extreme sports, and recreational aviation.”

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §3 · Annual report 2025.pdf (Items 9B, 12 & Risk Factors) · Q3-Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript.pdf ^{[1] [2] [5]}

3.2M&A History

Year	Target	Strategic role	Outcome
2012	Instagram (~$1B)	Visual social / mobile-native	One of the highest-return tech acquisitions in history
2014	WhatsApp (~$19B)	Global messaging platform	2B+ users; paid messaging $2B ARR crossed Q4 2025
2014	Oculus (~$2B)	VR / Reality Labs foundation	Strategic basis for RL; ~$19B/yr ongoing operating loss
2025+	Ray-Ban / Oakley partnerships	AI glasses distribution	Daily AI-glasses users tripled YoY Q1 2026
2026	MetaCompute / MSL build-out	Sovereign compute and AGI research	$107B new commitments Q1 2026; ROI unproven

Pattern Two historic deals (Instagram, WhatsApp) anchor the FoA franchise and remain the existential legal risk in the FTC appeal. Oculus / RL is the long-duration optionality bet still bleeding. MetaCompute is the live capital deployment whose ROI is the central thesis test.

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §3 & §6 ^[1]

3.3Said vs Delivered

Promise	When	Outcome	Consistent?
2023 = “Year of Efficiency”; cost base reset permanently	Q4 22 / early 23	Operating margin 25% → 41.4% by FY2025; FCF CAGR 3yr 35.9%	Yes — exceeded
AI-driven ad gains will be measurable quarterly	2023–24	Q4 25 +3% / +12%; Q1 26 ARM +1.6% / +6%	Yes — delivered
RL losses “likely peak in 2026, then gradually reduce”	Q4 25	FY25 RL loss $19.2B; FY26 guide “similar to 2025”	In progress; verify at FY26
Glasses sales among fastest in consumer electronics history	Q4 25	Daily AI-glasses users tripled YoY; revenue not yet material	Engagement yes
WhatsApp monetisation scaling	2024–25	$2B ARR crossed Q4 25; FoA other +74% Q1 26; Business AI 10x in one quarter	Ahead of trajectory
FY2026 CapEx ~$60–65B (original FY25 guide)	FY24 call	Re-guided to $115–135B at Q4 2025	No — magnitude wrong
FY2026 CapEx $115–135B	Q4 25	Raised to $125–145B 90 days later; “higher component pricing”	No — revised up
“We have continued to underestimate our compute needs”	Q1 26	$107B new commitments in Q1 alone	Acknowledged pattern
Revenue will continue to grow above peers despite AI spending	Q4 25	Q1 26 +33% — accelerating, beat guide	Yes — counterbalancing

Verdict Product and revenue execution is impressive. The persistent failure is CapEx guidance — every guide has revised upward, the CFO has explicitly called it a structural pattern, and the FCF compression consequence was predictable from the words. The investment case requires faith that the spend produces returns; ROIIC will tell the truth.

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §4 · META-Q1-2026-Earnings-Call-Transcript.pdf ^{[1] [4]}

Part 4

Key Ratios

4.1Growth Rates

Metric	1Y	3Y CAGR	5Y CAGR	10Y CAGR
FCF Growth (Per Share) %	-6.40%	35.90%	18.80%	20.30%
Revenue Growth (Per Share) %	28%	21.80%	19.60%	27%
EPS without NRI Growth %	8.20%	39.50%	20.10%	22.70%

Revenue accelerating Revenue 1Y 28% > 3Y 21.80% > 5Y 19.60% — clean acceleration on a five-year base near 20%; the ad flywheel keeps speeding up despite mega-cap size.

FCF/share 1Y -6.40% Against a 5Y 18.80% CAGR this is a pure capex artefact, not a business break — the $125–145B FY26 capex guide is absorbing all operating cash-flow growth.

SourcePortfolio snapshot 30.05.2026.txt (GuruFocus export) ^[10]

4.2Margins

Metric	Current	5Y Growth Rate	5Y Median
Gross Margin %	81.94%	0.40%	N/A
Operating Margin %	41.21%	2.80%	39.65%
FCF Margin %	22.45%	N/A	32.67%

Elite operating margin expanding Operating margin 41.21% — above the elite >30% threshold — and currently sitting above the 5Y median 39.65% even mid-capex cycle.

FCF margin compressing hard 22.45% sits 10pp below the 5Y median 32.67% — capex is eating cash at the conversion stage; still in the strong band but the gap quantifies the cycle drag.

SourcePortfolio snapshot 30.05.2026.txt ^[10]

4.3Capital Efficiency

Metric	Current	5Y Median
ROIC %	28.87%	26.05%
ROCE %	31.45%	30.74%
ROE %	34.10%	30.24%
Cash Conversion Ratio	0.68	0.87

ROIIC % (Return on Incremental Invested Capital)

Period	ROIIC %
1-Year	0.87%
3-Year	25.21%
5-Year	16.08%

ROIC still elite 28.87% sits above the 25% elite threshold and above the 5Y median 26.05% — the core advertising engine still earns world-class returns on the legacy capital base.

1Y ROIIC 0.87% Marginal capital is currently earning roughly zero; against a 3Y of 25.21% this is the most honest measure of the capex cycle — the spend has to start paying or the average ROIC follows it down.

SourcePortfolio snapshot 30.05.2026.txt ^[10]

4.4Balance Sheet Health

Metric	Current
Debt-to-Equity	0.36
Cash-to-Debt	0.94
Interest Coverage	59.62
Current Ratio	2.35

Fortress liquidity, no interest stress Interest coverage 59.62x is firmly in the safe band, current ratio 2.35 is comfortably liquid, and D/E 0.36 is conservative — the capex bill is being funded from a position of strength.

SourcePortfolio snapshot 30.05.2026.txt ^[10]

4.5Shareholder Returns & Other Metrics

Metric	Current
1-Year Dividend Growth Rate (Per Share) %	N/A
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate (Per Share) %	N/A
Dividends per Share (TTM)	$2.10
1-Year Share Buyback Ratio	N/A
3-Year Share Buyback Ratio	1.10
5-Year Share Buyback Ratio	2.40
Goodwill-to-Asset %	0.06
Stock Based Compensation (mm)	$22,312M
Free Cash Flow (mm)	$48,253M

SBC is 46% of FCF $22,312M SBC against $48,253M FCF lands well above the >15% dilutive band — owner earnings are roughly half of reported FCF, even as net buybacks of 2.40% (5Y) keep the float shrinking.

Goodwill-to-Asset 0.06 Almost no acquisition goodwill on the books — reported ROIC is being earned on built, not bought, capital.

SourcePortfolio snapshot 30.05.2026.txt ^[10]

Part 5

Valuation

5.1Current Multiples vs 10-Year Context

Multiple	Current	10yr median	Read
P / FCF	33.6x	30.8x	Above median; CapEx-suppressed FCF
EV / FCF	33.4x	—	Net cash but minimal
EV / EBIT	17.8x	—	Looks cheap; operating leverage intact
P / E (no NRI)	22.8x	—	Reasonable on reported earnings
FCF Yield	3.0%	—	Thin — capex compression

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §8 · META-Financials-Snapshot-2026-05-01.md ^{[1] [6]}

5.2Reverse DCF — What the Market Prices In

Two-stage model, 10% discount rate, 20-year horizon. Current price ~$612. Based on reported FCF.

Stage	Growth rate	Years	Implied at $612
Growth stage	~17%	1–10	—
Terminal stage	~3%	11+	—
Implied fair value	—	—	~$612

What this means The market is pricing ~17% FCF/share growth for a decade, then 3% terminal. The 5yr historical FCF/share CAGR was 18.8% (pre-ramp). On reported FCF, the market is pricing slightly below trend — a small discount for CapEx uncertainty. On owner earnings (every fair value number halves), the market is pricing exceptional optimism.

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §8 ^[1]

5.3DCF Scenarios

Scenario	Growth yrs 1–10	Terminal	Fair value	vs $612
Market implied	17%	3%	~$612	—
Bear (CapEx never normalises)	10%	3%	~$321	-47%
Base	15%	3%	~$545	-11%
Bull	20%	3%	~$744	+22%

Asymmetry At ~33.6x reported FCF, on reported FCF there is a residual MoS only in the bull case. Bear case fair value $321 (10% growth, capex never normalises): -47%. Base case fair value $545 (15% growth): -11%. Bull case fair value $744 (20% growth): +22%. On owner earnings every fair value above halves — no margin of safety. Meta is priced for continuing excellence, not for the current FCF compression. The forward IRR on new capital at current prices (~7%) is well below the portfolio's 15% hurdle.

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §8 & §9 ^[1]

Part 6

Risks

6.1Red flags, ranked by severity

CapEx guidance structurally unreliable — always revises upwardSeverity: high. FY2026 guide was $115–135B in January 2026; became $125–145B in April 2026, 90 days later. Susan Li explicitly: “We have continued to underestimate our compute needs.” $107B in new contractual commitments locked in Q1 alone signals 2027 CapEx is more likely higher than lower. Direct consequence: FCF/share -6.4% TTM despite revenue +28%/share. If FY2026 CapEx hits $140B and op cash flow is ~$65B, reported FCF may approach zero or turn negative for the full year.
SBC overstates owner earnings by ~46% of reported FCFSeverity: high. SBC was $22.3B TTM. Reported FCF TTM $48.3B. FCF/share $18.80. Owner earnings (FCF minus SBC) ~$9.50–10.50/share. At today's price: P/reported FCF ~34x, P/owner earnings ~60x. Defensible on owner earnings only if SBC as % of revenue shrinks over time (currently ~12–13%). Not yet in the data.
FTC antitrust appeal — Instagram/WhatsApp divestitureSeverity: high (tail risk, existential consequence). District court ruled in Meta's favour November 2025; FTC filed appeal January 2026. If an appellate court reverses and forces divestiture, the investment case is fundamentally broken — Instagram + WhatsApp likely represent 50%+ of advertising value. Active federal appellate proceeding; probability low but consequence existential.
1-year ROIIC = 0.87% — near zeroSeverity: medium. New CapEx dollars deployed in FY2025 have so far earned almost nothing back in incremental operating profit. Historical 3yr ROIIC was 25.2% (pre-ramp). The bet: ROIIC normalises back to 20%+ as infrastructure becomes productive in 2026–2028. Until ROIIC recovers, the capex thesis is unproven.
Regulatory and litigation exposure — multi-front, multi-jurisdictionSeverity: medium. Active: GDPR fine €1.2B (appealed); EC DMA €200M; EC DSA preliminary findings; FTC consent order; youth-addiction tort (damages “in the high tens of billions”); copyright/AI training suits. No single case likely fatal; cumulative drag on management attention, legal costs, and remedy-driven product changes is material and growing.
Key-person concentration — Zuckerberg controls everything with no institutional checkSeverity: medium. Dual-class structure gives Zuckerberg majority voting control. No succession plan disclosed. The 2022 metaverse pivot (~$700B in market cap drawdown before recovery) shows the downside of unchecked strategic error at this scale. 10-K risk factor explicitly notes Zuckerberg participates in “combat sports, extreme sports, and recreational aviation.”
Reality Labs losses ~$19B/yearSeverity: low. Fully funded by FoA profits and management has guided losses to be near peak. But $19B/year is real capital that could otherwise be returned to shareholders or redeployed in higher-ROIC opportunities. Glasses thesis is the only current evidence of traction.

SourceMETA-DOSSIER.md §6 ^[1]

Verdict

Hold at ~11%. Do not add. Wait for the CapEx cycle to top out.

Stance: Hold at ~11%. ~33.6x reported FCF; base case (15% growth) fair value $545: -11%. Do not add. The position earns its place as a core holding in a world-class franchise compounding long-term, but fresh capital belongs in businesses where the market is pricing impairment, not excellence.
Add zone: CapEx guide flattens or declines AND FCF/share resumes growth.
Trim trigger: P/FCF stays above 35x AND CapEx is raised again at Q2 (July 2026); a third consecutive upward CapEx revision triggers a trim to 8% weight.
Watching: Q2 2026 CapEx guidance (priority 1), 1yr ROIIC recovery from 0.87%, $107B contractual-commitment trajectory, WhatsApp other-revenue run-rate, FTC antitrust appeal docket, AI-glasses DAU growth.
Next review: Q2 2026 results, expected late July 2026.

Last reviewed May 25, 2026 after Q1 2026 results · Next review late July 2026 (Q2 2026)

References

Where every claim came from

[1]Company information/Meta/META-DOSSIER.mdLiving research-report source file, last updated 2026-05-25. Primary reference for all qualitative and quantitative content unless otherwise noted.
[2]Company information/Meta/Annual report 2025.pdfMeta Platforms FY2025 10-K annual report — primary source for business model, regulatory disclosures, and shareholder data.
[3]Company information/Meta/META-Q1-2026-Earnings-Notes.mdInternal Q1 2026 earnings analysis with line-item commentary (results reported 2026-04-29).
[4]Company information/Meta/META-Q1-2026-Earnings-Call-Transcript.pdfQ1 2026 earnings call transcript (Apr 29, 2026) — primary source for CapEx commentary and Susan Li / Zuckerberg quotes.
[5]Company information/Meta/Q3-Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript.pdfQ3 and Q4 2025 earnings call transcripts (Jan 28, 2026) — Year of Efficiency 2.0 framing and MetaCompute introduction.
[6]Company information/Meta/META-Financials-Snapshot-2026-05-01.mdFinancial-snapshot pull (Gurufocus, 2026-05-01) used for ROIC, ROCE, margin, multiple, and 10yr-median comparisons.
[7]Company information/Meta/META-earnings-analysis-FY2025.mdInternal FY2025 earnings analysis covering the 10-K and Q4 2025 call.
[8]Company information/Meta/Earnings-Presentation-Q1-2026.pdf and Meta 10Q Q3 2025.pdfRaw quarterly investor presentation (Q1 2026) and 10-Q (Q3 2025) for segment, KPI, and balance-sheet data.
[9]Stock portfolio/Meta analysis from poorcharlie.io.txtScoring framework and 26-item additional-moat checklist; used for the structure of Part 2.4 only, not for Meta-specific content.
[10]Portfolio snapshot 30.05.2026.txtGuruFocus portfolio snapshot exported 2026-05-30; primary source for Part 4 ratios.

This is one of three free sample reports.
Members get the full research universe: all 47 today, growing to 80, with quarterly updates after every earnings release.

See access plans